Toronto FC and New England Revolution Set for Closely Fought MLS Clash at BMO Field
An in-depth analysis of the tactical battle ahead

Toronto FC

New England Revolution
Toronto’s Home Numbers Put New England’s Position to Test
Toronto FC welcome New England Revolution to BMO Field on Saturday, August 15, with two very different objectives shaping this Eastern Conference meeting. Toronto’s strong home scoring record offers encouragement, but New England’s superior position makes the visitors the more consistent side on paper.
Match Context and Table Stakes
Kickoff is scheduled for 23:30 UTC in Round 19 of the MLS regular season. Toronto sit 12th in the Eastern Conference with 17 points from 18 matches, including three wins, eight draws and seven defeats, while New England occupy third with 30 points after nine wins, three draws and six losses.
The table gives both teams clear motivation. Toronto need to turn a high number of draws into victories if they are to move up the standings, whereas New England will be focused on protecting their position near the top. Toronto’s home record of two wins, five draws and two losses suggests they can make this uncomfortable, even if their overall goal difference is -8.
Recent Form and Momentum
Toronto’s recent sequence has been difficult to convert into momentum, with their latest five available results bringing three draws and two defeats. They drew 1-1 away to New York City FC, lost 2-1 at DC United, drew 0-0 with New England and CF Montreal, then suffered a 2-1 defeat at Chicago Fire.
New England have also produced an uneven recent run, recording one win, two draws and two losses in their last five. Their 4-1 victory over Atlanta United FC showed their attacking potential, but draws against CF Montreal and Toronto were followed by defeats to Houston Dynamo and Charlotte. The Revolution remain the stronger overall team, though their current form leaves the door open for Toronto.
Tactical Matchup
Toronto have shown tactical flexibility, using both the 3-4-2-1 and 4-2-3-1 six times each. A back-three setup could provide width and extra support in possession, while the two advanced players behind the striker may look to exploit spaces around New England’s midfield. The challenge will be maintaining defensive cover, especially after conceding 18 goals in nine home games and keeping no clean sheets.
New England have relied far more consistently on a 4-2-3-1, used in 12 matches, with the 4-3-3 serving as their alternative. That familiarity should help them control the central areas and respond to Toronto’s changes in shape. However, the Revolution have scored only seven goals in seven away fixtures while conceding 13, so Toronto’s home attack could test a defence that has not produced an away clean sheet.
Prediction and Expected Outcome
Toronto’s 17 home goals, averaging 1.90 per match, make them capable of causing problems despite their low position. New England’s league standing and stronger season record provide a solid foundation, but their modest away scoring rate of 1.00 goal per game points toward a potentially cautious contest.
Prediction: Toronto FC 1-1 New England Revolution. Toronto’s home attacking numbers should earn them chances, while New England’s greater consistency and recent draw between these teams suggest the visitors can leave BMO Field with a point.
By the numbers
The data behind Toronto FC vs New England Revolution, in 4 charts.
The season so far
Wins, draws and losses side by side
Two different teams?
Home and away form for Toronto FC
Who wins more often?
Share of league games won this season
How they line up
Most-used formations this season
The table as it stands
| Logo | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vancouver Whitecaps | DDLWL | 17 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 38 | 17 | 34 | |
| 2 | Los Angeles FC | DWWWW | 19 | 10 | 4 | 5 | 35 | 19 | 34 | |
| 3 | San Jose Earthquakes | LDLWL | 18 | 10 | 3 | 5 | 37 | 24 | 33 | |
| 4 | Houston Dynamo | WWWDD | 18 | 10 | 2 | 6 | 27 | 24 | 32 | |
| 5 | Real Salt Lake | DLLDW | 17 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 29 | 25 | 27 | |
| 6 | FC Dallas | DLDWW | 18 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 32 | 25 | 27 | |
| 7 | St. Louis City | DWWWW | 18 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 24 | 24 | 26 | |
| 8 | Portland Timbers | WWDWL | 18 | 7 | 3 | 8 | 33 | 33 | 24 | |
| 9 | Seattle Sounders | LLLLL | 17 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 20 | 22 | 24 | |
| 10 | Minnesota United FC | DDLDL | 18 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 20 | 25 | 24 | |
| 11 | Colorado Rapids | WLWLL | 18 | 7 | 1 | 10 | 27 | 25 | 22 | |
| 12 | Los Angeles Galaxy | DDLLD | 19 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 24 | 29 | 22 | |
| 13 | San Diego | DWLLD | 18 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 32 | 29 | 21 | |
| 14 | Austin | LLWLL | 18 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 22 | 36 | 17 | |
| 15 | Sporting Kansas City | LLWLL | 18 | 4 | 2 | 12 | 18 | 46 | 14 | |
| 1 | Nashville SC | DLWWW | 18 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 35 | 14 | 40 | |
| 2 | Inter Miami | DWWWW | 18 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 45 | 32 | 38 | |
| 3 | New England Revolution | LDWDL | 18 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 28 | 23 | 30 | |
| 4 | Chicago Fire | WLLWW | 17 | 9 | 2 | 6 | 32 | 23 | 29 | |
| 5 | New York City FC | DWWLD | 18 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 31 | 24 | 26 | |
| 6 | FC Cincinnati | WLWWD | 18 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 45 | 44 | 26 | |
| 7 | Charlotte | LWDWW | 18 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 29 | 27 | 25 | |
| 8 | New York Red Bulls | WLLWD | 18 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 29 | 39 | 25 | |
| 9 | DC United | DWDDD | 18 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 26 | 29 | 23 | |
| 10 | Orlando City SC | LWWLD | 18 | 6 | 2 | 10 | 30 | 47 | 20 | |
| 11 | Columbus Crew | DWLWD | 18 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 26 | 28 | 20 | |
| 12 | Toronto FC | DLDDL | 18 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 24 | 32 | 17 | |
| 13 | Philadelphia Union | WWWLD | 18 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 25 | 33 | 16 | |
| 14 | CF Montreal | DLLDD | 18 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 24 | 35 | 16 | |
| 15 | Atlanta United FC | LLDLL | 18 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 19 | 33 | 12 |