Portland’s 29 Home Goals Put Sixth Place Within Reach
An in-depth analysis of the tactical battle ahead

Portland Timbers

St. Louis City
Portland’s home strength meets St. Louis consistency
Portland Timbers welcome St. Louis City to Providence Park on Thursday, September 10, with six points separating the Western Conference teams. St. Louis sit fifth on 37 points after 23 matches, while Portland are eighth with 31. Both remain within reach of the leaders, although Vancouver Whitecaps’ 43 points leave Portland 12 behind and St. Louis six adrift.
The table gives St. Louis the stronger position, but Portland’s home record makes this a difficult fixture to call. The Timbers have won seven, drawn two and lost three of their 12 home matches, scoring 29 goals and conceding 22. Their single home clean sheet underlines the attacking promise and defensive vulnerability of their season. St. Louis have been more balanced away from home, recording four wins, four draws and four losses, with 15 goals scored and 17 conceded.
Contrasting structures in midfield
Portland’s 4-2-3-1 has been their clear preference, used in 16 matches, with a 4-1-4-1 and 4-3-3 providing alternatives. That shape should give them a stable base while allowing their attacking midfield line to support a home-centred approach. The Timbers may need to turn their territorial advantage into chances without leaving too much space behind their defensive midfielders.
St. Louis have consistently used a back-three system: 3-4-2-1 in 11 matches, 3-4-3 in nine and 3-4-1-2 in three. Their numbers suggest a team comfortable changing the arrangement of its attacking players while retaining the same broad defensive structure. The visitors’ challenge will be to use the extra central defender and wide players effectively against Portland’s four-man setup, particularly when possession changes hands.
Momentum and selection questions
Portland’s most recent sequence is Win, Draw, Loss, Win when read through their last four results, showing a mixed but active run. St. Louis have drawn their latest match after a loss and three straight defeats, although their longer form list includes several wins and draws. The visitors therefore arrive with the better league position, but neither side has an entirely settled recent rhythm.
Portland will be without A. Aravena, B. Bye and J. Mosquera, while T. Muse is questionable. St. Louis are missing Celio Pompeu, K. Hiebert and C. Wallem, with P. Ault, J. Orozco and T. Ostrak doubtful. The absences of Aravena and Mosquera reduce Portland’s available options, while St. Louis must account for three confirmed unavailabilities and possible further changes. That could encourage both coaches to value structure before committing numbers forward.
What is at stake
A Portland victory would cut the gap to three points and strengthen their position in the Western Conference race. St. Louis, meanwhile, can protect their five-place advantage and move closer to Vancouver’s leading total with another positive away result. With Portland’s home scoring record contrasting with St. Louis’ steadier road profile, the venue may prove decisive.
Prediction: Portland Timbers 2-1 St. Louis City. Portland’s stronger home record and 29 home goals should give them the edge in a closely contested match.
By the numbers
The data behind Portland Timbers vs St. Louis City, in 4 charts.
The season so far
Wins, draws and losses side by side
Two different teams?
Home and away form for Portland Timbers
Who wins more often?
Share of league games won this season
How they line up
Most-used formations this season
The table as it stands
| Logo | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vancouver Whitecaps | LWWLW | 22 | 13 | 4 | 5 | 49 | 21 | 43 | |
| 2 | Houston Dynamo | DDLWW | 23 | 12 | 4 | 7 | 30 | 26 | 40 | |
| 3 | Los Angeles FC | DDDLL | 24 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 38 | 24 | 37 | |
| 4 | FC Dallas | WDLWW | 23 | 10 | 7 | 6 | 45 | 40 | 37 | |
| 5 | St. Louis City | WDWDW | 23 | 10 | 7 | 6 | 36 | 31 | 37 | |
| 6 | San Jose Earthquakes | DDLLL | 23 | 10 | 5 | 8 | 40 | 34 | 35 | |
| 7 | Colorado Rapids | LWLWW | 23 | 10 | 1 | 12 | 31 | 31 | 31 | |
| 8 | Portland Timbers | WLDWL | 23 | 9 | 4 | 10 | 44 | 43 | 31 | |
| 9 | San Diego | LWWLW | 23 | 8 | 6 | 9 | 40 | 34 | 30 | |
| 10 | Real Salt Lake | DLLLD | 22 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 36 | 35 | 29 | |
| 11 | Minnesota United FC | LDWLD | 23 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 34 | 37 | 29 | |
| 12 | Los Angeles Galaxy | WLDWL | 24 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 30 | 36 | 29 | |
| 13 | Seattle Sounders | DDDLL | 22 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 24 | 29 | 27 | |
| 14 | Austin | DWDWL | 23 | 6 | 7 | 10 | 29 | 42 | 25 | |
| 15 | Sporting Kansas City | LLLDL | 23 | 4 | 3 | 16 | 23 | 58 | 15 | |
| 1 | Nashville SC | DWWWW | 23 | 16 | 5 | 2 | 47 | 17 | 53 | |
| 2 | Inter Miami | DWLDL | 23 | 12 | 7 | 4 | 58 | 43 | 43 | |
| 3 | Chicago Fire | DDDWW | 22 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 43 | 32 | 38 | |
| 4 | New England Revolution | LWDWL | 23 | 11 | 4 | 8 | 37 | 29 | 37 | |
| 5 | Charlotte | DWWDW | 23 | 10 | 6 | 7 | 40 | 32 | 36 | |
| 6 | FC Cincinnati | LDWDW | 22 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 49 | 51 | 31 | |
| 7 | New York City FC | DDDLL | 23 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 36 | 31 | 29 | |
| 8 | Orlando City SC | WDWLD | 23 | 8 | 4 | 11 | 38 | 54 | 28 | |
| 9 | Philadelphia Union | WWDDW | 23 | 7 | 6 | 10 | 36 | 39 | 27 | |
| 10 | New York Red Bulls | DLDLL | 23 | 7 | 6 | 10 | 32 | 46 | 27 | |
| 11 | Toronto FC | DDWDW | 23 | 5 | 11 | 7 | 36 | 42 | 26 | |
| 12 | DC United | DLLDD | 22 | 5 | 10 | 7 | 28 | 36 | 25 | |
| 13 | Columbus Crew | WLLLL | 23 | 6 | 5 | 12 | 34 | 39 | 23 | |
| 14 | Atlanta United FC | DLWWW | 23 | 6 | 4 | 13 | 27 | 40 | 22 | |
| 15 | CF Montreal | LLDWD | 23 | 5 | 6 | 12 | 30 | 48 | 21 |