Philadelphia’s home record can close the gap on Cincinnati
An in-depth analysis of the tactical battle ahead

Philadelphia Union

FC Cincinnati
Philadelphia’s home strength meets Cincinnati’s away weakness
Philadelphia Union welcome FC Cincinnati to Subaru Park on Wednesday with four points separating the Eastern Conference sides. Philadelphia sit ninth with 27 points from 23 matches, while Cincinnati are sixth on 31 points from 22. Both remain well behind leaders Nashville SC, who have 53 points, making every opportunity to improve their position increasingly important as the regular season continues.
Momentum turning in Philadelphia’s favour
The Union’s overall record of seven wins, six draws and 10 losses reflects an uneven campaign, but their recent sequence offers encouragement. After a run containing six defeats in seven matches, Philadelphia have won four of their last seven games and drawn twice, including consecutive victories in their most recent two fixtures. That improvement gives the hosts a chance to build momentum at a venue where they have taken four wins and four draws from 11 matches.
Cincinnati’s recent form is less convincing. Their 8-7-7 record is stronger than Philadelphia’s on the table, but the visitors have lost three of their last five games, with one win in that sequence. Their away record is a particular concern: one victory, five draws and five defeats, alongside 30 goals conceded and no clean sheets.
A shape-versus-shape tactical test
Philadelphia have used a 4-4-2 in all 23 of their matches, giving them a consistent structure and two central attacking options. Their home numbers suggest a controlled platform, with 14 goals scored, 11 conceded and four clean sheets. They will want that organisation to limit Cincinnati’s attacking threat while making the most of the visitors’ defensive record away from home.
Cincinnati have shown greater variety, most often using either a 3-5-2 or a 3-4-1-2, with further appearances for 3-4-2-1, 3-4-3, 4-4-2 and 3-1-4-2. Their 18 away goals, averaging 1.60 per game, indicate a side capable of creating danger on the road. The question is whether their changing shape can offer more protection after conceding an average of 2.70 away goals per match.
Absences add another layer
Philadelphia will be without A. Anello because of a muscle injury, while P. Ndinga is questionable with a hamstring injury. Cincinnati are missing S. Gidi through injury, and K. Fletcher is doubtful with a knee injury. Those unavailable or uncertain options could encourage both teams to rely on their established structures, particularly Philadelphia’s settled 4-4-2.
Prediction
Philadelphia Union 2-1 FC Cincinnati. The Union’s improving momentum and stronger home record should edge a contest in which Cincinnati’s away defensive problems remain decisive.
By the numbers
The data behind Philadelphia Union vs FC Cincinnati, in 4 charts.
The season so far
Wins, draws and losses side by side
Two different teams?
Home and away form for Philadelphia Union
Who wins more often?
Share of league games won this season
How they line up
Most-used formations this season
The table as it stands
| Logo | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vancouver Whitecaps | LWWLW | 22 | 13 | 4 | 5 | 49 | 21 | 43 | |
| 2 | Houston Dynamo | DDLWW | 23 | 12 | 4 | 7 | 30 | 26 | 40 | |
| 3 | Los Angeles FC | DDDLL | 24 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 38 | 24 | 37 | |
| 4 | FC Dallas | WDLWW | 23 | 10 | 7 | 6 | 45 | 40 | 37 | |
| 5 | St. Louis City | WDWDW | 23 | 10 | 7 | 6 | 36 | 31 | 37 | |
| 6 | San Jose Earthquakes | DDLLL | 23 | 10 | 5 | 8 | 40 | 34 | 35 | |
| 7 | Colorado Rapids | LWLWW | 23 | 10 | 1 | 12 | 31 | 31 | 31 | |
| 8 | Portland Timbers | WLDWL | 23 | 9 | 4 | 10 | 44 | 43 | 31 | |
| 9 | San Diego | LWWLW | 23 | 8 | 6 | 9 | 40 | 34 | 30 | |
| 10 | Real Salt Lake | DLLLD | 22 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 36 | 35 | 29 | |
| 11 | Minnesota United FC | LDWLD | 23 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 34 | 37 | 29 | |
| 12 | Los Angeles Galaxy | WLDWL | 24 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 30 | 36 | 29 | |
| 13 | Seattle Sounders | DDDLL | 22 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 24 | 29 | 27 | |
| 14 | Austin | DWDWL | 23 | 6 | 7 | 10 | 29 | 42 | 25 | |
| 15 | Sporting Kansas City | LLLDL | 23 | 4 | 3 | 16 | 23 | 58 | 15 | |
| 1 | Nashville SC | DWWWW | 23 | 16 | 5 | 2 | 47 | 17 | 53 | |
| 2 | Inter Miami | DWLDL | 23 | 12 | 7 | 4 | 58 | 43 | 43 | |
| 3 | Chicago Fire | DDDWW | 22 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 43 | 32 | 38 | |
| 4 | New England Revolution | LWDWL | 23 | 11 | 4 | 8 | 37 | 29 | 37 | |
| 5 | Charlotte | DWWDW | 23 | 10 | 6 | 7 | 40 | 32 | 36 | |
| 6 | FC Cincinnati | LDWDW | 22 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 49 | 51 | 31 | |
| 7 | New York City FC | DDDLL | 23 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 36 | 31 | 29 | |
| 8 | Orlando City SC | WDWLD | 23 | 8 | 4 | 11 | 38 | 54 | 28 | |
| 9 | Philadelphia Union | WWDDW | 23 | 7 | 6 | 10 | 36 | 39 | 27 | |
| 10 | New York Red Bulls | DLDLL | 23 | 7 | 6 | 10 | 32 | 46 | 27 | |
| 11 | Toronto FC | DDWDW | 23 | 5 | 11 | 7 | 36 | 42 | 26 | |
| 12 | DC United | DLLDD | 22 | 5 | 10 | 7 | 28 | 36 | 25 | |
| 13 | Columbus Crew | WLLLL | 23 | 6 | 5 | 12 | 34 | 39 | 23 | |
| 14 | Atlanta United FC | DLWWW | 23 | 6 | 4 | 13 | 27 | 40 | 22 | |
| 15 | CF Montreal | LLDWD | 23 | 5 | 6 | 12 | 30 | 48 | 21 |