New England’s 14-point advantage tested by Columbus’s home record
An in-depth analysis of the tactical battle ahead

Columbus Crew

New England Revolution
A 14-point gap sets the context
Columbus Crew welcome New England Revolution to ScottsMiracle-Gro Field on Saturday, August 29, with kick-off scheduled for 23:30 UTC. The Regular Season - 22 meeting brings together two Eastern Conference teams separated by 14 points after 21 matches. New England sit fourth on 34 points, while Columbus are 15th on 20 points with a -6 goal difference.
The wider table adds further perspective. Nashville SC lead the league with 49 points, leaving New England 15 points from the summit and Columbus 29 points behind. For the Revolution, another positive result would strengthen their position among the conference’s leading teams. The Crew, meanwhile, need points to reduce the distance to the sides above them and give their season a more positive direction.
Contrasting momentum
Columbus arrive with an uneven overall record of five wins, five draws and 11 losses. Their most recent sequence is particularly difficult: three defeats in their last five matches, including losses in each of their two most recent outings. Their home record offers some encouragement, however, with four wins, two draws and four losses. They have scored 13 goals and conceded 11 at home, recording three clean sheets.
New England’s 10 wins, four draws and seven defeats show why they occupy fourth place, although their recent results have also fluctuated. Their latest five matches read draw, win, loss, loss, win. Away from home, the Revolution have taken two wins and two draws from nine games, while losing five. They have scored 11 away goals, conceded 15 and kept one clean sheet, numbers that could give Columbus reason to attack with confidence.
Shape against shape
Columbus have used a 4-4-2 in 15 matches, making it their clear preferred structure. The shape can give them two forward options and a balanced four-man midfield, particularly important when trying to make home advantage count. Their other formations have appeared only sparingly: 3-4-3 and 3-4-2-1 twice each, with 4-2-3-1 used once.
New England have primarily chosen a 4-2-3-1, used in 13 matches, with a 4-3-3 deployed eight times. Their usual double-pivot structure could help them manage the central areas against Columbus’s two banks of four, while the attacking midfield line offers a route to stretch the home side. A switch to 4-3-3 would provide a different midfield balance if the Revolution need more width or control.
Absences add another variable
Columbus will be without W. Abou Ali, S. Bangoura and J. Thiare, listed with knee, ankle and leg injuries respectively. New England are missing I. Feingold and L. Langoni through lower-body injuries, while T. Smith is inactive. L. Campana is questionable with a hamstring injury, leaving his availability as an additional consideration for the visitors.
Prediction
Prediction: Columbus Crew 1-1 New England Revolution. Columbus’s home record can offset New England’s superior league position, while the Revolution’s stronger season record should be enough to secure a share of the points.
By the numbers
The data behind Columbus Crew vs New England Revolution, in 4 charts.
The season so far
Wins, draws and losses side by side
Two different teams?
Home and away form for Columbus Crew
Who wins more often?
Share of league games won this season
How they line up
Most-used formations this season
The table as it stands
| Logo | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vancouver Whitecaps | WLWDD | 20 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 45 | 18 | 40 | |
| 2 | Houston Dynamo | LWWWW | 21 | 12 | 2 | 7 | 30 | 26 | 38 | |
| 3 | Los Angeles FC | DLLDW | 22 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 36 | 22 | 35 | |
| 4 | San Jose Earthquakes | LLLLD | 21 | 10 | 3 | 8 | 39 | 33 | 33 | |
| 5 | FC Dallas | LWWDL | 21 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 38 | 34 | 33 | |
| 6 | St. Louis City | WDWDW | 21 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 30 | 27 | 33 | |
| 7 | Colorado Rapids | LWWWL | 21 | 9 | 1 | 11 | 30 | 28 | 28 | |
| 8 | Real Salt Lake | LLDDL | 20 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 34 | 32 | 28 | |
| 9 | Portland Timbers | DWLWW | 21 | 8 | 4 | 9 | 38 | 37 | 28 | |
| 10 | Minnesota United FC | WLDDD | 21 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 27 | 29 | 28 | |
| 11 | San Diego | WLWDW | 21 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 37 | 32 | 27 | |
| 12 | Los Angeles Galaxy | DWLDD | 22 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 27 | 32 | 26 | |
| 13 | Seattle Sounders | DLLLL | 20 | 7 | 4 | 9 | 22 | 27 | 25 | |
| 14 | Austin | DWLLL | 21 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 26 | 40 | 21 | |
| 15 | Sporting Kansas City | LDLLL | 21 | 4 | 3 | 14 | 20 | 51 | 15 | |
| 1 | Nashville SC | WWWDL | 21 | 15 | 4 | 2 | 43 | 17 | 49 | |
| 2 | Inter Miami | LDLDW | 21 | 11 | 6 | 4 | 49 | 40 | 39 | |
| 3 | Chicago Fire | DWWWL | 20 | 11 | 3 | 6 | 37 | 26 | 36 | |
| 4 | New England Revolution | DWLLD | 21 | 10 | 4 | 7 | 33 | 26 | 34 | |
| 5 | Charlotte | WDWLW | 21 | 9 | 5 | 7 | 38 | 32 | 32 | |
| 6 | FC Cincinnati | DWDWL | 21 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 49 | 47 | 31 | |
| 7 | New York City FC | DLLDW | 21 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 35 | 30 | 27 | |
| 8 | New York Red Bulls | DLLWL | 21 | 7 | 5 | 9 | 31 | 43 | 26 | |
| 9 | Orlando City SC | WLDLW | 21 | 7 | 3 | 11 | 34 | 51 | 24 | |
| 10 | Toronto FC | WDWDL | 21 | 5 | 9 | 7 | 31 | 37 | 24 | |
| 11 | DC United | LLDDW | 21 | 5 | 9 | 7 | 28 | 36 | 24 | |
| 12 | Atlanta United FC | WWWLL | 21 | 6 | 3 | 12 | 25 | 36 | 21 | |
| 13 | Philadelphia Union | DDWWW | 21 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 31 | 38 | 21 | |
| 14 | CF Montreal | DWDDL | 21 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 29 | 39 | 21 | |
| 15 | Columbus Crew | LLLDW | 21 | 5 | 5 | 11 | 30 | 36 | 20 |