Nashville’s 10-1-0 home record puts Cincinnati under pressure
An in-depth analysis of the tactical battle ahead

Nashville SC

FC Cincinnati
Nashville’s 10-1-0 home record sets the tone
Nashville SC welcome FC Cincinnati to Geodis Park on Sunday, August 30, with the Eastern Conference leaders holding a commanding advantage. Nashville have collected 49 points from 21 matches, while Cincinnati sit sixth on 31 points. The 18-point gap means the hosts can strengthen their position at the summit, whereas Cincinnati need a result to reduce the distance to the leading group.
Kick-off is scheduled for 00:30 UTC, with A. Villarreal appointed referee. Nashville’s home numbers make them clear favourites: they have won 10 of 11 matches in Nashville, drawing the other, while scoring 32 goals and conceding 12. Their three home clean sheets underline a strong record, even though they have not been flawless defensively.
Contrasting momentum before kick-off
Nashville arrive with outstanding overall form. Their 21-match sequence contains 15 wins, four draws and only two losses, and their most recent three results are all victories. That run gives the leaders considerable momentum and supports an assertive approach in front of their home crowd.
Cincinnati’s record is more uneven, with eight wins, seven draws and six losses in the same number of league matches. Their latest three results are a draw, a win and a draw, suggesting some resistance but less consistency than their opponents. Away from home, the numbers are particularly demanding: one win, five draws and four defeats, with 18 goals scored and 26 conceded. Cincinnati have yet to keep a clean sheet on the road.
Formation choices could shape the contest
Nashville’s most-used setup is a 4-4-2, selected in nine matches, followed by the 4-3-3 and 4-2-3-1, each used six times. The regular 4-4-2 could provide a direct two-player attacking reference against Cincinnati’s back three, while the alternative systems offer different ways to use width and an extra central midfielder.
Cincinnati have primarily used a back-three structure, with the 3-5-2 appearing seven times and the 3-4-1-2 six times. They have also used the 3-4-2-1, 3-4-3 and 3-1-4-2. That variety may help them adjust to Nashville’s shape, but the visitors must protect the spaces around their defensive three after conceding 2.60 goals per away game.
Absences and what is at stake
Nashville will be without C. Applewhite and W. Madrigal, both listed with lower-body injuries. With both unavailable, Nashville may prefer the familiarity of one of their established formations rather than make unnecessary structural changes. Cincinnati’s away record makes defensive discipline essential, but their position also creates an incentive to take measured attacking risks against the leaders.
Prediction: Nashville SC 3-1 FC Cincinnati. The leaders’ home record, stronger momentum and Cincinnati’s away defensive figures point to another Nashville victory, although the visitors’ 18 away goals should give them a route to score.
By the numbers
The data behind Nashville SC vs FC Cincinnati, in 4 charts.
The season so far
Wins, draws and losses side by side
Two different teams?
Home and away form for Nashville SC
Who wins more often?
Share of league games won this season
How they line up
Most-used formations this season
The table as it stands
| Logo | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vancouver Whitecaps | WLWDD | 20 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 45 | 18 | 40 | |
| 2 | Houston Dynamo | LWWWW | 21 | 12 | 2 | 7 | 30 | 26 | 38 | |
| 3 | Los Angeles FC | DLLDW | 22 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 36 | 22 | 35 | |
| 4 | San Jose Earthquakes | LLLLD | 21 | 10 | 3 | 8 | 39 | 33 | 33 | |
| 5 | FC Dallas | LWWDL | 21 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 38 | 34 | 33 | |
| 6 | St. Louis City | WDWDW | 21 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 30 | 27 | 33 | |
| 7 | Colorado Rapids | LWWWL | 21 | 9 | 1 | 11 | 30 | 28 | 28 | |
| 8 | Real Salt Lake | LLDDL | 20 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 34 | 32 | 28 | |
| 9 | Portland Timbers | DWLWW | 21 | 8 | 4 | 9 | 38 | 37 | 28 | |
| 10 | Minnesota United FC | WLDDD | 21 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 27 | 29 | 28 | |
| 11 | San Diego | WLWDW | 21 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 37 | 32 | 27 | |
| 12 | Los Angeles Galaxy | DWLDD | 22 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 27 | 32 | 26 | |
| 13 | Seattle Sounders | DLLLL | 20 | 7 | 4 | 9 | 22 | 27 | 25 | |
| 14 | Austin | DWLLL | 21 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 26 | 40 | 21 | |
| 15 | Sporting Kansas City | LDLLL | 21 | 4 | 3 | 14 | 20 | 51 | 15 | |
| 1 | Nashville SC | WWWDL | 21 | 15 | 4 | 2 | 43 | 17 | 49 | |
| 2 | Inter Miami | LDLDW | 21 | 11 | 6 | 4 | 49 | 40 | 39 | |
| 3 | Chicago Fire | DWWWL | 20 | 11 | 3 | 6 | 37 | 26 | 36 | |
| 4 | New England Revolution | DWLLD | 21 | 10 | 4 | 7 | 33 | 26 | 34 | |
| 5 | Charlotte | WDWLW | 21 | 9 | 5 | 7 | 38 | 32 | 32 | |
| 6 | FC Cincinnati | DWDWL | 21 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 49 | 47 | 31 | |
| 7 | New York City FC | DLLDW | 21 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 35 | 30 | 27 | |
| 8 | New York Red Bulls | DLLWL | 21 | 7 | 5 | 9 | 31 | 43 | 26 | |
| 9 | Orlando City SC | WLDLW | 21 | 7 | 3 | 11 | 34 | 51 | 24 | |
| 10 | Toronto FC | WDWDL | 21 | 5 | 9 | 7 | 31 | 37 | 24 | |
| 11 | DC United | LLDDW | 21 | 5 | 9 | 7 | 28 | 36 | 24 | |
| 12 | Atlanta United FC | WWWLL | 21 | 6 | 3 | 12 | 25 | 36 | 21 | |
| 13 | Philadelphia Union | DDWWW | 21 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 31 | 38 | 21 | |
| 14 | CF Montreal | DWDDL | 21 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 29 | 39 | 21 | |
| 15 | Columbus Crew | LLLDW | 21 | 5 | 5 | 11 | 30 | 36 | 20 |