Five points separate San Jose and Houston before a pivotal Western Conference meeting
An in-depth analysis of the tactical battle ahead
How this story was made
- Evidence
- fixture data, league standings, team statistics, events, and injuries
- Generated
- 9/12/2026, 8:05:58 AM
- Model
- GPT56Luna
- Editorial checks
- passed · score 95/100 · 513 words

San Jose Earthquakes

Houston Dynamo
A five-point gap puts second place on the line in San Jose
San Jose Earthquakes host Houston Dynamo at PayPal Park on Sunday, September 13, with both teams entering Round 25 in the Western Conference’s top five. Houston sit second with 43 points from 24 matches, while San Jose are fifth on 38. The Dynamo are also only three points behind leaders Vancouver Whitecaps, whereas the Earthquakes trail the leaders by eight.
Recent momentum has shifted
San Jose’s latest result was a win, but their wider recent sequence has been uneven. Their last five matches contain one win, two draws and two losses. Houston’s most recent five include two wins and three losses, so neither side arrives with a sustained run of control. The home team will hope its latest victory can provide a platform, while Houston can point to the stronger position and the chance to respond after setbacks.
A settled home shape meets a flexible visitor
San Jose have used a 4-2-3-1 in 19 matches, making it the clearest tactical reference for this fixture. That shape could give them two central midfielders for protection while allowing the attacking midfield line to support the lone forward. They have also used a 3-4-2-1 three times and a 4-3-3 once.
Houston have shown greater variety. Their most-used formations are the 3-4-3, 4-2-3-1 and 4-1-4-1, each used five times. They have also deployed a 4-4-2 three times, plus a 4-3-3, 3-4-2-1, 4-4-1-1 and 4-5-1. That range may allow the Dynamo to adjust their midfield numbers or defensive structure during the match. San Jose’s consistent setup against Houston’s varied options could make the shape of the central areas especially important.
Home and away numbers suggest a balanced contest
San Jose’s home record is four wins, two draws and five losses. They have scored 19 goals and conceded 19 in those matches, averaging 1.70 for and 1.70 against, with three clean sheets. Houston’s away record is five wins, two draws and five losses. The Dynamo have scored 17 away goals and conceded 19, averaging 1.40 and 1.60 respectively, while recording five clean sheets. Those figures suggest Houston have offered more defensive resistance on the road, even though both teams have identical away or home loss totals in the supplied records.
Absences add another layer
San Jose will be without N. Adimabua, E. Edwards, D. Johnson and P. Marie through injury, with D. Jones also unavailable because of an Achilles tendon injury. T. Werner is listed with an injury, while M. Floriani is suspended after a red card. Those absences could encourage a more conservative use of the established 4-2-3-1, particularly if the Earthquakes want to protect their defensive numbers.
Houston will miss L. Foster, who is inactive, and J. Maurer, who has a concussion. M. Saracchi is questionable with a lower-body injury. The Dynamo’s formation flexibility may be useful if that uncertainty affects their preferred personnel.
Prediction
Prediction: San Jose Earthquakes 1-1 Houston Dynamo. San Jose’s home scoring rate should create opportunities, but Houston’s five away clean sheets and stronger league position point to a disciplined response.
By the numbers
The data behind San Jose Earthquakes vs Houston Dynamo, in 4 charts.
The season so far
Wins, draws and losses side by side
Two different teams?
Home and away form for San Jose Earthquakes
Who wins more often?
Share of league games won this season
How they line up
Most-used formations this season
The table as it stands
| Logo | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vancouver Whitecaps | WLWWL | 23 | 14 | 4 | 5 | 52 | 21 | 46 | |
| 2 | Houston Dynamo | WDDLW | 24 | 13 | 4 | 7 | 32 | 27 | 43 | |
| 3 | Los Angeles FC | WDDDL | 25 | 11 | 7 | 7 | 40 | 24 | 40 | |
| 4 | FC Dallas | WWDLW | 24 | 11 | 7 | 6 | 47 | 41 | 40 | |
| 5 | San Jose Earthquakes | WDDLL | 24 | 11 | 5 | 8 | 43 | 36 | 38 | |
| 6 | St. Louis City | DWDWD | 24 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 38 | 33 | 38 | |
| 7 | Colorado Rapids | DLWLW | 24 | 10 | 2 | 12 | 32 | 32 | 32 | |
| 8 | Portland Timbers | DWLDW | 24 | 9 | 5 | 10 | 46 | 45 | 32 | |
| 9 | San Diego | LLWWL | 24 | 8 | 6 | 10 | 42 | 37 | 30 | |
| 10 | Real Salt Lake | LDLLL | 23 | 8 | 5 | 10 | 37 | 37 | 29 | |
| 11 | Minnesota United FC | LLDWL | 24 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 35 | 39 | 29 | |
| 12 | Los Angeles Galaxy | LWLDW | 25 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 30 | 39 | 29 | |
| 13 | Seattle Sounders | DDDLL | 22 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 24 | 29 | 27 | |
| 14 | Austin | DDWDW | 24 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 30 | 43 | 26 | |
| 15 | Sporting Kansas City | LLLDL | 23 | 4 | 3 | 16 | 23 | 58 | 15 | |
| 1 | Nashville SC | LDWWW | 24 | 16 | 5 | 3 | 48 | 19 | 53 | |
| 2 | Inter Miami | DDWLD | 24 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 59 | 44 | 44 | |
| 3 | New England Revolution | WLWDW | 24 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 39 | 30 | 40 | |
| 4 | Chicago Fire | DDDDW | 23 | 11 | 6 | 6 | 44 | 33 | 39 | |
| 5 | Charlotte | WDWWD | 24 | 11 | 6 | 7 | 42 | 33 | 39 | |
| 6 | Orlando City SC | WWDWL | 24 | 9 | 4 | 11 | 41 | 56 | 31 | |
| 7 | FC Cincinnati | LLDWD | 23 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 49 | 56 | 31 | |
| 8 | Philadelphia Union | WWWDD | 24 | 8 | 6 | 10 | 41 | 39 | 30 | |
| 9 | New York City FC | LDDDL | 24 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 37 | 33 | 29 | |
| 10 | Toronto FC | WDDWD | 24 | 6 | 11 | 7 | 38 | 43 | 29 | |
| 11 | DC United | WDLLD | 23 | 6 | 10 | 7 | 30 | 37 | 28 | |
| 12 | New York Red Bulls | LDLDL | 24 | 7 | 6 | 11 | 32 | 48 | 27 | |
| 13 | Columbus Crew | LWLLL | 24 | 6 | 5 | 13 | 35 | 41 | 23 | |
| 14 | Atlanta United FC | LDLWW | 24 | 6 | 4 | 14 | 29 | 43 | 22 | |
| 15 | CF Montreal | LLLDW | 24 | 5 | 6 | 13 | 31 | 50 | 21 |