Eight Points Separate FC Dallas and Portland Before Toyota Stadium Meeting
An in-depth analysis of the tactical battle ahead
How this story was made
- Evidence
- fixture data, league standings, team statistics, events, and injuries
- Generated
- 9/12/2026, 8:04:39 AM
- Model
- GPT56Luna
- Editorial checks
- passed · score 95/100 · 478 words

FC Dallas

Portland Timbers
Dallas hold the stronger position
FC Dallas welcome Portland Timbers to Toyota Stadium, Frisco, on Sunday, September 13, with eight points separating the Western Conference sides. Dallas sit fourth on 40 points from 24 matches, while Portland are eighth on 32. The hosts are six points behind leaders Vancouver Whitecaps, giving them a clear opportunity to keep pace near the top of the table. Portland, meanwhile, need a result to narrow the gap to the leading playoff positions.
Recent momentum favours the hosts
Dallas have taken 11 wins, seven draws and six losses this season. Their most recent five results, listed from newest to oldest, are two wins, two draws and one loss. That sequence suggests a team carrying more reliable momentum into this fixture, even though the latest result was a draw. Portland’s corresponding five-match run contains one win, one draw and three losses. Their wider record of nine wins, five draws and 10 losses underlines the inconsistency they must overcome away from home.
Contrasting tactical shapes
Dallas have used the 3-4-2-1 more than any other formation, choosing it in seven matches. They have also deployed the 3-5-2 three times and the 4-4-2 three times. Portland have shown a much clearer preference, using a 4-2-3-1 in 16 matches, compared with four appearances each for the 4-3-3 and 4-1-4-1. On the supplied evidence, Dallas may seek to use their three-man defensive base and two supporting attackers to overload central areas, while Portland’s consistent four-man structure offers a more familiar framework for transitions.
Home advantage against a poor road record
Dallas are unbeaten in eight of their 10 home matches, with four wins and four draws. They have scored 22 goals at Toyota Stadium, averaging 2.20 per game, but have conceded 19 and kept only one clean sheet. Portland’s away record is weaker: two wins, two draws and seven losses. They average 1.40 goals scored and 1.90 conceded on the road, with no away clean sheets. That combination points to a contest in which Portland must limit the spaces Dallas have used to produce their strong home scoring rate.
Absences could reshape the contest
Dallas will be without Daniel because of a hamstring injury, A. A. Julio Santos through injury and O. Urhoghide after yellow-card accumulation. Geovane Jesus and P. Musa are questionable with knee and upper-body injuries respectively. Portland are missing A. Aravena, B. Bye, J. Caicedo and J. Mosquera through hip, leg, thigh and foot injuries, while T. Muse is questionable with a wrist injury. The longer Portland list may reduce their flexibility from the bench, while Dallas’ missing defensive option and two doubtful players could encourage a more conservative approach if they are unavailable.
Prediction
Predicted score: FC Dallas 2-1 Portland Timbers. Dallas’ home scoring record, stronger recent sequence and higher table position give them the edge, although their limited clean-sheet record should allow Portland opportunities.
By the numbers
The data behind FC Dallas vs Portland Timbers, in 4 charts.
The season so far
Wins, draws and losses side by side
Two different teams?
Home and away form for FC Dallas
Who wins more often?
Share of league games won this season
How they line up
Most-used formations this season
The table as it stands
| Logo | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vancouver Whitecaps | WLWWL | 23 | 14 | 4 | 5 | 52 | 21 | 46 | |
| 2 | Houston Dynamo | WDDLW | 24 | 13 | 4 | 7 | 32 | 27 | 43 | |
| 3 | Los Angeles FC | WDDDL | 25 | 11 | 7 | 7 | 40 | 24 | 40 | |
| 4 | FC Dallas | WWDLW | 24 | 11 | 7 | 6 | 47 | 41 | 40 | |
| 5 | San Jose Earthquakes | WDDLL | 24 | 11 | 5 | 8 | 43 | 36 | 38 | |
| 6 | St. Louis City | DWDWD | 24 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 38 | 33 | 38 | |
| 7 | Colorado Rapids | DLWLW | 24 | 10 | 2 | 12 | 32 | 32 | 32 | |
| 8 | Portland Timbers | DWLDW | 24 | 9 | 5 | 10 | 46 | 45 | 32 | |
| 9 | San Diego | LLWWL | 24 | 8 | 6 | 10 | 42 | 37 | 30 | |
| 10 | Real Salt Lake | LDLLL | 23 | 8 | 5 | 10 | 37 | 37 | 29 | |
| 11 | Minnesota United FC | LLDWL | 24 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 35 | 39 | 29 | |
| 12 | Los Angeles Galaxy | LWLDW | 25 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 30 | 39 | 29 | |
| 13 | Seattle Sounders | DDDLL | 22 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 24 | 29 | 27 | |
| 14 | Austin | DDWDW | 24 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 30 | 43 | 26 | |
| 15 | Sporting Kansas City | LLLDL | 23 | 4 | 3 | 16 | 23 | 58 | 15 | |
| 1 | Nashville SC | LDWWW | 24 | 16 | 5 | 3 | 48 | 19 | 53 | |
| 2 | Inter Miami | DDWLD | 24 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 59 | 44 | 44 | |
| 3 | New England Revolution | WLWDW | 24 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 39 | 30 | 40 | |
| 4 | Chicago Fire | DDDDW | 23 | 11 | 6 | 6 | 44 | 33 | 39 | |
| 5 | Charlotte | WDWWD | 24 | 11 | 6 | 7 | 42 | 33 | 39 | |
| 6 | Orlando City SC | WWDWL | 24 | 9 | 4 | 11 | 41 | 56 | 31 | |
| 7 | FC Cincinnati | LLDWD | 23 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 49 | 56 | 31 | |
| 8 | Philadelphia Union | WWWDD | 24 | 8 | 6 | 10 | 41 | 39 | 30 | |
| 9 | New York City FC | LDDDL | 24 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 37 | 33 | 29 | |
| 10 | Toronto FC | WDDWD | 24 | 6 | 11 | 7 | 38 | 43 | 29 | |
| 11 | DC United | WDLLD | 23 | 6 | 10 | 7 | 30 | 37 | 28 | |
| 12 | New York Red Bulls | LDLDL | 24 | 7 | 6 | 11 | 32 | 48 | 27 | |
| 13 | Columbus Crew | LWLLL | 24 | 6 | 5 | 13 | 35 | 41 | 23 | |
| 14 | Atlanta United FC | LDLWW | 24 | 6 | 4 | 14 | 29 | 43 | 22 | |
| 15 | CF Montreal | LLLDW | 24 | 5 | 6 | 13 | 31 | 50 | 21 |