Colorado’s 8-3 home record gives them the edge over Montreal
An in-depth analysis of the tactical battle ahead
How this story was made
- Evidence
- fixture data, league standings, team statistics, events, and injuries
- Generated
- 9/12/2026, 8:05:41 AM
- Model
- GPT56Luna
- Editorial checks
- passed · score 90/100 · 516 words

Colorado Rapids

CF Montreal
Colorado’s 8-3 home record sets the tone
Colorado Rapids welcome CF Montreal to Dick’s Sporting Goods Park on Sunday, September 13, with the teams separated by 11 points after 24 matches. Colorado sit seventh in the Western Conference on 32 points, while Montreal are 15th in the Eastern Conference on 21. The Rapids also have an even goal difference, compared with Montreal’s -19.
The home numbers underline Colorado’s advantage. They have won eight of 11 league matches at home, scoring 21 goals and conceding nine. Six of those matches ended with a clean sheet. Montreal’s away record is 2-1-9, with 15 goals scored and 35 conceded. Their one away clean sheet also points to a difficult defensive assignment in Trade City.
Recent momentum favours the Rapids
Colorado’s most recent five results are Loss, Draw, Win, Loss and Win, giving them two victories in that sequence. Their latest result was a draw, but the wider run includes three wins in their last six matches listed. That gives the home side a platform to build from, even if consistency has not been complete.
Montreal’s current sequence is more concerning. Their last five results are Loss, Loss, Loss, Win and Loss, while the supplied form also contains several draws. Their latest three results are defeats, so Laurentians? No—Montreal arrive without the same recent lift as their hosts. With a long away defeat record and a negative goal difference, they may need to prioritise stability before taking greater attacking risks.
Contrasting shapes could define the midfield
Colorado’s preferred setup is the 4-2-3-1, used in 12 matches, with the 4-3-3 their next most common choice at eight. Montreal have favoured the 4-3-3 in 15 matches and used a 4-2-3-1 in nine. That suggests both teams have a familiar route into a four-player defensive structure, but Montreal may be more committed to the wider attacking shape while Colorado have more often relied on an extra layer of midfield protection.
The numbers make that contrast important. Colorado’s home defensive record supports a controlled approach, while Montreal’s away concession rate of 2.90 goals per game gives the Rapids reason to test them early and often. Montreal’s 1.30 away goals per game means their 4-3-3 must provide a sharper response when possession turns into chances.
Absences add uncertainty
Colorado will be without R. Cannon through yellow-card accumulation, as well as M. Diop, T. Ku-DiPietro and goalkeeper Z. Steffen because of injuries. Y. Maziz and K. Stewart-Baynes are questionable. Steffen’s absence is especially significant because it changes the goalkeeping picture, while the missing defensive and attacking options could make Colorado’s preferred structure less flexible.
Montreal are missing F. Amaya with a lower-body injury, M. Longstaff through yellow-card accumulation and J. Neal because of concussion. B. Hidalgo and D. Pereira are questionable. Those absences could make Montreal’s established 4-3-3 harder to sustain for 90 minutes, particularly if the match demands more control in midfield or greater defensive cover.
Prediction
Colorado Rapids 2-0 CF Montreal. The Rapids’ strong home defence and Montreal’s 35 goals conceded away make a home win with a clean sheet the most likely outcome.
By the numbers
The data behind Colorado Rapids vs CF Montreal, in 4 charts.
The season so far
Wins, draws and losses side by side
Two different teams?
Home and away form for Colorado Rapids
Who wins more often?
Share of league games won this season
How they line up
Most-used formations this season
The table as it stands
| Logo | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vancouver Whitecaps | WLWWL | 23 | 14 | 4 | 5 | 52 | 21 | 46 | |
| 2 | Houston Dynamo | WDDLW | 24 | 13 | 4 | 7 | 32 | 27 | 43 | |
| 3 | Los Angeles FC | WDDDL | 25 | 11 | 7 | 7 | 40 | 24 | 40 | |
| 4 | FC Dallas | WWDLW | 24 | 11 | 7 | 6 | 47 | 41 | 40 | |
| 5 | San Jose Earthquakes | WDDLL | 24 | 11 | 5 | 8 | 43 | 36 | 38 | |
| 6 | St. Louis City | DWDWD | 24 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 38 | 33 | 38 | |
| 7 | Colorado Rapids | DLWLW | 24 | 10 | 2 | 12 | 32 | 32 | 32 | |
| 8 | Portland Timbers | DWLDW | 24 | 9 | 5 | 10 | 46 | 45 | 32 | |
| 9 | San Diego | LLWWL | 24 | 8 | 6 | 10 | 42 | 37 | 30 | |
| 10 | Real Salt Lake | LDLLL | 23 | 8 | 5 | 10 | 37 | 37 | 29 | |
| 11 | Minnesota United FC | LLDWL | 24 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 35 | 39 | 29 | |
| 12 | Los Angeles Galaxy | LWLDW | 25 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 30 | 39 | 29 | |
| 13 | Seattle Sounders | DDDLL | 22 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 24 | 29 | 27 | |
| 14 | Austin | DDWDW | 24 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 30 | 43 | 26 | |
| 15 | Sporting Kansas City | LLLDL | 23 | 4 | 3 | 16 | 23 | 58 | 15 | |
| 1 | Nashville SC | LDWWW | 24 | 16 | 5 | 3 | 48 | 19 | 53 | |
| 2 | Inter Miami | DDWLD | 24 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 59 | 44 | 44 | |
| 3 | New England Revolution | WLWDW | 24 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 39 | 30 | 40 | |
| 4 | Chicago Fire | DDDDW | 23 | 11 | 6 | 6 | 44 | 33 | 39 | |
| 5 | Charlotte | WDWWD | 24 | 11 | 6 | 7 | 42 | 33 | 39 | |
| 6 | Orlando City SC | WWDWL | 24 | 9 | 4 | 11 | 41 | 56 | 31 | |
| 7 | FC Cincinnati | LLDWD | 23 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 49 | 56 | 31 | |
| 8 | Philadelphia Union | WWWDD | 24 | 8 | 6 | 10 | 41 | 39 | 30 | |
| 9 | New York City FC | LDDDL | 24 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 37 | 33 | 29 | |
| 10 | Toronto FC | WDDWD | 24 | 6 | 11 | 7 | 38 | 43 | 29 | |
| 11 | DC United | WDLLD | 23 | 6 | 10 | 7 | 30 | 37 | 28 | |
| 12 | New York Red Bulls | LDLDL | 24 | 7 | 6 | 11 | 32 | 48 | 27 | |
| 13 | Columbus Crew | LWLLL | 24 | 6 | 5 | 13 | 35 | 41 | 23 | |
| 14 | Atlanta United FC | LDLWW | 24 | 6 | 4 | 14 | 29 | 43 | 22 | |
| 15 | CF Montreal | LLLDW | 24 | 5 | 6 | 13 | 31 | 50 | 21 |