11 Home Wins Put Nashville SC in Position to Extend Their Lead
An in-depth analysis of the tactical battle ahead
How this story was made
- Evidence
- fixture data, league standings, team statistics, events, and injuries
- Generated
- 9/19/2026, 8:03:40 AM
- Model
- GPT56Luna
- Editorial checks
- passed · score 95/100 · 456 words

Nashville SC

Chicago Fire
Nashville’s home record sets the tone
Nashville SC welcome Chicago Fire to Geodis Park with a clear statistical advantage. The Eastern Conference leaders have taken 54 points from 25 matches, including 16 wins, six draws and three losses. Chicago sit fifth on 39 points from 24 games, leaving a 15-point gap between the teams.
That difference is reinforced by Nashville’s home record. They have won 11 of 12 home matches, drawing the other, while scoring 36 goals and conceding 12. Their average of 3.00 goals scored at home gives Chicago an immediate test, although Nashville have kept only four home clean sheets.
Contrasting momentum
Nashville’s latest results point to a team that has maintained its pace near the top. Their five most recent matches contain four wins and one draw, and the broader sequence also includes a long run of victories. The recent draw provides a reminder that their form is not flawless, but the overall direction remains strong.
Chicago enter after a loss. Their last five results include two wins, one draw and two defeats, while their 24-match record shows a balanced 11 wins, six draws and seven losses. The Fire have enough results to support their position in the top five, but Nashville’s recent consistency gives the hosts the stronger momentum.
Formation choices and availability
Nashville’s most-used shape is 4-4-2, selected in 10 matches, followed by 4-2-3-1 in nine and 4-3-3 in six. That variety could allow them to adjust their structure during the match. Chicago have most often used 4-2-3-1, with nine appearances, while 4-4-2 has been used eight times and 4-3-3 five times. Their 3-4-3 and 5-4-1 choices suggest additional structural options, though the supplied figures do not indicate which shape will start.
W. Madrigal is unavailable for Nashville because of a lower-body injury. Chicago will be without A. Franco because of a knee injury and M. Mbokazi because of a lower-body injury, while A. Saletros is questionable with a lower-body injury. Those absences may narrow Chicago’s selection options more significantly, whereas Nashville have one listed missing player.
What is at stake
Nashville can strengthen their hold on first place and extend the pressure on the teams below them. Chicago, meanwhile, have a chance to cut into the gap to the conference leader and reinforce their top-five position. Their away record—four wins, five draws and three losses—shows they can collect points on the road, but they have conceded 21 away goals compared with 23 scored.
Nashville’s attacking home numbers make them the more convincing choice, while Chicago’s away scoring record gives them a route into the contest. Prediction: Nashville SC 2-1 Chicago Fire, because the leaders’ dominant home record and stronger recent form should outweigh Chicago’s capacity to score away from home.
By the numbers
The data behind Nashville SC vs Chicago Fire, in 4 charts.
The season so far
Wins, draws and losses side by side
Two different teams?
Home and away form for Nashville SC
Who wins more often?
Share of league games won this season
How they line up
Most-used formations this season
The table as it stands
| Logo | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vancouver Whitecaps | LWLWW | 24 | 14 | 4 | 6 | 53 | 23 | 46 | |
| 2 | Houston Dynamo | LWDDL | 25 | 13 | 4 | 8 | 32 | 28 | 43 | |
| 3 | FC Dallas | WWWDL | 25 | 12 | 7 | 6 | 49 | 42 | 43 | |
| 4 | San Jose Earthquakes | WWDDL | 25 | 12 | 5 | 8 | 44 | 36 | 41 | |
| 5 | St. Louis City | WDWDW | 25 | 11 | 8 | 6 | 42 | 35 | 41 | |
| 6 | Los Angeles FC | LWDDD | 26 | 11 | 7 | 8 | 41 | 27 | 40 | |
| 7 | Colorado Rapids | WDLWL | 25 | 11 | 2 | 12 | 33 | 32 | 35 | |
| 8 | Portland Timbers | LDWLD | 25 | 9 | 5 | 11 | 47 | 47 | 32 | |
| 9 | San Diego | LLLWW | 25 | 8 | 6 | 11 | 42 | 42 | 30 | |
| 10 | Los Angeles Galaxy | DLWLD | 26 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 31 | 40 | 30 | |
| 11 | Real Salt Lake | LLDLL | 24 | 8 | 5 | 11 | 37 | 39 | 29 | |
| 12 | Minnesota United FC | LLLDW | 25 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 37 | 43 | 29 | |
| 13 | Austin | WDDWD | 25 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 32 | 44 | 29 | |
| 14 | Seattle Sounders | DDDDL | 23 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 25 | 30 | 28 | |
| 15 | Sporting Kansas City | WLLLD | 24 | 5 | 3 | 16 | 26 | 59 | 18 | |
| 1 | Nashville SC | DLDWW | 25 | 16 | 6 | 3 | 50 | 21 | 54 | |
| 2 | Inter Miami | DDDWL | 25 | 12 | 9 | 4 | 61 | 46 | 45 | |
| 3 | New England Revolution | WWLWD | 25 | 13 | 4 | 8 | 41 | 31 | 43 | |
| 4 | Charlotte | DWDWW | 25 | 11 | 7 | 7 | 45 | 36 | 40 | |
| 5 | Chicago Fire | LDDDD | 24 | 11 | 6 | 7 | 45 | 35 | 39 | |
| 6 | Orlando City SC | WWWDW | 25 | 10 | 4 | 11 | 44 | 56 | 34 | |
| 7 | Philadelphia Union | WWWWD | 25 | 9 | 6 | 10 | 46 | 39 | 33 | |
| 8 | New York Red Bulls | WWLDL | 26 | 9 | 6 | 11 | 34 | 48 | 33 | |
| 9 | New York City FC | LWLDD | 26 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 39 | 34 | 32 | |
| 10 | FC Cincinnati | DLLDW | 24 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 52 | 59 | 32 | |
| 11 | DC United | DWDLL | 24 | 6 | 11 | 7 | 30 | 37 | 29 | |
| 12 | Toronto FC | LWDDW | 25 | 6 | 11 | 8 | 38 | 46 | 29 | |
| 13 | Columbus Crew | LLWLL | 25 | 6 | 5 | 14 | 35 | 42 | 23 | |
| 14 | Atlanta United FC | DLDLW | 25 | 6 | 5 | 14 | 29 | 43 | 23 | |
| 15 | CF Montreal | LLLLD | 25 | 5 | 6 | 14 | 31 | 51 | 21 |