FC Cincinnati vs NYCFC: One-Point Playoff Battle at TQL Stadium
An in-depth analysis of the tactical battle ahead

FC Cincinnati

New York City FC
One Point Separates Cincinnati and NYCFC at TQL Stadium
FC Cincinnati’s 28 home goals provide the attacking backdrop as they welcome New York City FC to TQL Stadium on Wednesday, August 19. With only one point separating the Eastern Conference neighbours after 19 matches, the result could reshape the race around sixth and seventh place.
Table Position and Recent Form
Cincinnati enter the meeting sixth with 27 points from seven wins, six draws and six defeats, while NYCFC are directly behind them on 26 points. A home victory would give Cincinnati valuable breathing room, whereas three points for the visitors would move them above their opponents and add pressure to the teams around the playoff places.
Neither side has established sustained momentum. Cincinnati’s recent sequence includes wins, defeats and several draws, with their latest result a draw, while NYCFC have also followed positive spells with setbacks and arrive with a recent loss among their results. The home side’s 6-1-2 record at TQL Stadium offers encouragement, but NYCFC’s goal difference of six compared with Cincinnati’s one shows that the visitors have been more efficient across the season.
Tactical Matchup
Cincinnati have primarily built around a back three, with the 3-4-1-2 used six times and the 3-5-2 five times. That setup can create a front two against NYCFC’s centre-backs, while the wing-backs provide width and help explain the hosts’ impressive home scoring total of 28 goals in nine matches.
The risk is visible in Cincinnati’s defensive record: they have conceded 19 times at home and kept only two clean sheets. NYCFC’s preferred 4-2-3-1, used in 13 matches, should give them a compact midfield platform from which to absorb pressure and attack the spaces behind Cincinnati’s advanced wing-backs. Their away matches have produced only eight goals scored and nine conceded, suggesting a more controlled approach could suit the visitors.
Team News and Selection Questions
NYCFC have the longer list of confirmed absences, with D. Baiera, A. Farnos, A. Martinez, M. Moralez and A. O’Neill unavailable. The losses of M. Moralez and A. Martinez are particularly significant to the visitors’ attacking and creative options, while A. O’Neill’s absence may further reduce defensive flexibility.
M. Murray, Thiago Martins, K. Trewin and H. Wolf are also questionable, leaving uncertainty around NYCFC’s defensive and midfield selection. Cincinnati’s team news is not fully detailed in the supplied information, so their principal selection challenge is less clear; however, the hosts will want enough defensive security to support their aggressive home approach.
Prediction and Key Factors
The key contest should develop between Cincinnati’s width and attacking numbers and NYCFC’s ability to keep their 4-2-3-1 compact. If the hosts move the visitors’ defensive block from side to side, their home scoring record points to opportunities, but exposed spaces could allow NYCFC to exploit the three-man defence on the counter.
Prediction: FC Cincinnati 2-1 New York City FC. Cincinnati’s stronger home attack should edge a close game, although NYCFC’s superior goal difference and narrow table gap make this unlikely to be one-sided.
By the numbers
The data behind FC Cincinnati vs New York City FC, in 4 charts.
The season so far
Wins, draws and losses side by side
Two different teams?
Home and away form for FC Cincinnati
Who wins more often?
Share of league games won this season
How they line up
Most-used formations this season
The table as it stands
| Logo | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vancouver Whitecaps | WDDLW | 18 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 40 | 17 | 37 | |
| 2 | Houston Dynamo | WWWWD | 19 | 11 | 2 | 6 | 28 | 24 | 35 | |
| 3 | Los Angeles FC | LDWWW | 20 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 35 | 20 | 34 | |
| 4 | San Jose Earthquakes | LLDLW | 19 | 10 | 3 | 6 | 38 | 27 | 33 | |
| 5 | FC Dallas | WDLDW | 19 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 34 | 26 | 30 | |
| 6 | St. Louis City | WDWWW | 19 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 27 | 25 | 29 | |
| 7 | Real Salt Lake | DDLLD | 18 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 30 | 26 | 28 | |
| 8 | Colorado Rapids | WWLWL | 19 | 8 | 1 | 10 | 29 | 25 | 25 | |
| 9 | Minnesota United FC | DDDLD | 19 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 21 | 26 | 25 | |
| 10 | Portland Timbers | LWWDW | 19 | 7 | 3 | 9 | 34 | 35 | 24 | |
| 11 | Seattle Sounders | LLLLL | 18 | 7 | 3 | 8 | 20 | 24 | 24 | |
| 12 | San Diego | WDWLL | 19 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 33 | 29 | 24 | |
| 13 | Los Angeles Galaxy | LDDLL | 20 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 24 | 30 | 22 | |
| 14 | Austin | LLLWL | 19 | 4 | 5 | 10 | 23 | 38 | 17 | |
| 15 | Sporting Kansas City | LLLWL | 19 | 4 | 2 | 13 | 18 | 48 | 14 | |
| 1 | Nashville SC | WDLWW | 19 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 39 | 15 | 43 | |
| 2 | Inter Miami | LDWWW | 19 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 46 | 36 | 38 | |
| 3 | Chicago Fire | WWLLW | 18 | 10 | 2 | 6 | 34 | 24 | 32 | |
| 4 | New England Revolution | LLDWD | 19 | 9 | 3 | 7 | 29 | 25 | 30 | |
| 5 | Charlotte | WLWDW | 19 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 32 | 28 | 28 | |
| 6 | FC Cincinnati | DWLWW | 19 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 46 | 45 | 27 | |
| 7 | New York City FC | LDWWL | 19 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 33 | 27 | 26 | |
| 8 | New York Red Bulls | LWLLW | 19 | 7 | 4 | 8 | 30 | 41 | 25 | |
| 9 | DC United | DDWDD | 19 | 5 | 9 | 5 | 27 | 30 | 24 | |
| 10 | Orlando City SC | DLWWL | 19 | 6 | 3 | 10 | 31 | 48 | 21 | |
| 11 | Columbus Crew | LDWLW | 19 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 27 | 31 | 20 | |
| 12 | Toronto FC | WDLDD | 19 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 26 | 33 | 20 | |
| 13 | Philadelphia Union | WWWWL | 19 | 5 | 4 | 10 | 28 | 35 | 19 | |
| 14 | CF Montreal | DDLLD | 19 | 4 | 5 | 10 | 25 | 36 | 17 | |
| 15 | Atlanta United FC | WLLDL | 19 | 4 | 3 | 12 | 21 | 34 | 15 |